Housing Code Khrushchev left the residents without a license

Housing Code, which is actively pushing power, making the apartment owners in the Khrushchev actually disfranchised, leaving them one on one with the powerful construction companies, with a pack of unscrupulous lawyers and skinhead guards. About this article for The Mirror of the week. Ukraina "wrote Alexander Sergienko (Institute of the City"). "The problem is reduced to the problem of Khrushchev relocation or eviction. (Not counting, of course, bribes for access to land). This problem is being addressed through a separate law passed back in 2006. Now that was regulated by a law, developers of housing and communal services" shoved "into a single article 166. Naturally, it did not make any selection criteria for housing, going under reconstruction, nor the rights of those being relocated, no guarantee against abuse of authority or the developer (all described sparingly ... and stupidly)," - says author of the article. "In fact, people are left alone with the powerful construction companies, with a pack of unscrupulous lawyers and skinhead guards. And the authorities can make it even easier to - to bring home to such an extent that people would be willing to relocate anywhere, just to move. Such a" script "flashed in the TV story about one of the districts of Kiev ", - stated in the article. "To speak here about such lofty matters as the sanctity of private property, which is guaranteed by Art. 41 of the Constitution simply does not make sense - friends do not understand," - says the author. Code - a single piece of legislation that classifies (generalize) one area of ??the law and revises the previously existing laws. It was logical to expect that housing services will bring them under one cover and replace. However, due to transitional provisions, we learn that, for example, the Law on privatization "continues to act as a base, and he, in some points of principle (see below) comes into conflict with new housing and utility services. Law on SDMX also works, but "taking into account the requirements of this Code and the State Program of development and reform of housing and communal services in 2010 - 2014 years." Consequently, neither of which codification can be no question. For what he wrote then?