Reconstruction of "Khrushchev: pitfalls and potential risks

The government promises to start the rebuilding of obsolete housing already this year. Everything is written in two laws, the main of which - the law on the comprehensive reconstruction of neighborhoods, dilapidated housing estates. "Therefore, if your home" falls "under reconstruction - in the future have the right to improve their living conditions. But for a start have a few years to live in temporary accommodation. reconstruction will be carried out in 3 stages during the first must build a starter home. By law they must be located within the city. Therefore, you may have to temporarily move to another district. "to the start house, note or in the draft Housing Code, nor in the existing law, any claims for improvement are not reduced. Moreover, if the law prescribes the establishment of a valid start house, the realization of investment projects on reconstruction of the quarters on the draft of the Housing Code allows for resettlement in communal housing and public property. That is, there does not even require the creation of start-up home, "- says lawyer Natalia Dotsenko-Belous. After deciding on the reconstruction of districts, the BTI is recorded encumbrance on the property. And from that moment another sleeping or registration of new residents is limited. And then, how many" square meters "get a new home depends on the number of rooms in an old apartment." The second important rule, which prevents, in my opinion, the abuse is the norm that regardless of the number of the registered persons, the area that gets the owner or the aggregate these owners, is equal to the area of ??the apartment, which he had before. Maximum may be increased to 50 percent. However, it is not conditional on the number of prescribed persons, or registered, those who rent, or the number of owners, "- says Natalia Dotsenko-Belous. Lawyers have warned that under the law, abuses are possible, more likely, by the developers. Because there is a risk that usher in the start house, and the new - no. For such a responsibility builder in the law is not spelled out.