Power creates a corrupt system of export of agricultural products

In the Ukraine can be created "State agent" for the export of objects of price regulation that will create a completely corrupt system of agricultural exports. About this article for The Mirror of the week. Ukraina "wrote Sergei Koziakov, associate professor of the Institute of International Relations. As the author notes, in the autumn and winter in Ukraine and already created a strange non-transparent procedures for the issuance of quotas on grain exports. However, "a group of serious people" that seemed enough. Draft Law of Ukraine N8053 "On Amendments to the Law On State Support of Agriculture of Ukraine" envisages the creation of "Gosagenta." According to the project, export is expected to either exclusively farmers, but only within its own production, or Gosagentom. (This applies to agricultural products, which Cabinet Included in the list of price controls.) The author believes that the draft law can present a number of claims. "The bill requires the creation of an entirely new system of agricultural exports by billions of dollars, thousands of economic change in the chains between producers and banks, manufacturers and traders, traders and carriers are silos and ports. And in a memorandum not a word about financial and tax implications for the budget "- the author writes." Assumed, for example, that Gosagent that can be created with the participation of the state shall be determined on a competitive basis, the Cabinet. Can define several uncomfortable questions. Who will determine the size of the state's share? How and what the parties will carry out capital contributions? As will be assessed share? Gosagent will be determined at auction, and on what basis will be determined by non-state actors hozobschestva? "- The article says." Here is how to nekorruptsionny passage: a list of items whose export would be in accordance with this law, "established by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine annually results of monitoring of the agricultural market. " On what principles? In what terms? Imagine that in 2011 wheat Cabinet did not include in the list, and in 2012 it was included. And in 2013, again not included. Who wants to spend money on logistics, business development, fund raising? But there is also barley, rye, canola, sunflower ... What there is not corruption! We are no longer talking about the wonderful practice of holding transparent and fair tender procedures, - the author writes.